|
Section One - Part Three: Selection of the Kings
by Iain Mac an tSaoir
Who knows exactly at what point the selection of kings began, or what
proceedures were used to select the first king. We can be fairly certain
that the person's ability, coupled with their charisma were major factors.
In the societies which descended from the Indo-Europeans, the position of
the King held, as this whole article has to date shown, a position which by
its nature was sacred.
Through the mating with the Mare, the King was coupled to the Goddess of
Sovereignty of the land. Through the sacrifice the cosmos was renewed.
Through the division of the sacrifice into three parts, each representing a
segment of the society, and the King consuming of the three parts, he
belonged to all three segments. The whole of the people became represented
in him. (1)
What needs to be addressed is the selection process of the kings in Gaelic
culture. This is a topic that is rarely if ever addressed from a factual
point of view. Usually the focus is on the potential meanings of the
metaphorical language found in lore. While we can with some confidence
speculate that the lore is addressing possible initiatory elements in the
ascent to kinghood (2), what is being addressed here are the actual
selection processes of the king himself.
The scene that Cambrensis described took place in the 11th century, and
shows the rites through which the king ascended to governance. There are
quite a few Irish law tracts from before that time which describe the
process for selecting kings. While things may have changed slighty through
the centuries, we know from these law tracts exact details of the
procedure. According to Fergus Kelly, things were pretty much the same at
the fall of Gaelic civil order in the seventeenth century, as it was in the
8th century (3). One such tract is called C/oic Conairi Fuigill, which
interpreted means "The Five Paths Of Judgement". This law tract states that
a pretender to kingship must be a son of a king (mac flatha) and the
grandson of a king. This tract is detailed enough to tell us that if a
man's father had been a king, but his grandfather had not, then he was only
a "middle ranking king" (flaith med/onac).(4) This wasn't primogenitor
exactly, it was more that the list of candidates came from families of
enough standing and experience in leading as chieftain. It was from the
list of candidates from certain families that the chieftain was selected.
C/oic Conairi Fuigill also confirms what has been found in many other
places about the condition of the pretender. In the eyes of the law he must
be beyond reproach (innraic), nor could he be guilty of theft, nor could he
have any physical blemish.(5) According to this tract, there were even
minimum requirements for property owned (ni bi r/i r/i cen fola). To the
new king's own property, new land was added. These lands came from
gelfines. This makes sense when one considers the laws regarding the
requirements of the King's Brugiadh and other things. He had to be able to
fulfill his title. This included taking care of those who functioned as
royal officials.(6)
SOURCES
1. Death War and Sacrifice, Bruce Lincoln
2. The lore is repleat with examples of metaphorical language regarding
kings and kings to be. A frequent theme is the "kissing of the Hag". In
this there is repulsion felt by many pretenders to the kingship. But one
overcomes the repulsion of sovereingty, kisses the hag, after which she
turns into a beautiful woman.
3. A Guide To Early Irish Law, Fergus Kelly, Dundalgan Press Ltd.,
1988,ISBN 0790-4657 & 0-901282-95-2.
4. "C/oic Conairi Fuigill, Die funf Wege zum Urteil, ein altirischer
Rechstext", Thurneyson, Berlin, 1925
5. Ibid
6. Ibid
|